www.therfl.co.uk/news/article/29 ... st-utility 300k for Wigan v Hudds on sky Or 65k for Worcester v Leicester (most supported prem team and away from home) on BT I think we backed the right horse with sky

www.therfl.co.uk/news/article/29 ... st-utility 300k for Wigan v Hudds on sky Or 65k for Worcester v Leicester (most supported prem team and away from home) on BT I think we backed the right horse with sky

Great news. Lets hope its a great game tonight. I can see the benifts of Thurs games when it comes to TV as fans/views have less time between games. Are they doing Monday games this season?

Indeed. RU can afford to take big money in exchange for reduced exposure of club rugby due to the massive press they get from their international game. We'd need to be offered silly money to consider restricting our exposure to that sort of level.

[url=http://viewtopic.php?p=17714185&tsmp=1392669740#p17714185Don't believe everything the RFL tell you![/url

I would not believe anything that comes out of Red Hall, it is pure survival tactics of one member of senior staff.

Yes League may get better viewing figures than Union, but those figures are just a drop in the ocean, even if they were 300,000!

The problem is the Sky contract was rushed though too quickly, clubs were held to ransom, and what will the money be worth in 8 years time, will we as a sport have sold ourselves short financially?

Not at all.
If someone offered me a 40% pay rise but I'd have to stay there for 8 years if be made up, I believe the term is golden handcuffs?

But wouldn't you put your cv out first to test the market?

We don't know if it wasn't though do we?

Not according to Koukashs interview on Radio Manchester last Thursday.

If you rule BT out, which I would have, why would you put your CV out there?

And to keep using the same analogy, if i was happy where i was with my current employer, a 40% payrise to stay and lots of job security would do very nicely.